Ñî¹óåú´«Ã½

Start main page content

SA’S trans­ition to renew­ables needs pub­lic and private own­er­ship if it’s to be suc­cess­ful

- Imraan Valo­dia

The cli­mate trans­ition is often framed as a tech­nical, sci­entific or fin­an­cial chal­lenge – about how we develop tech­no­lo­gies to address cli­mate change, or mobil­ise the enorm­ous fin­an­cial resources required for the trans­ition.

But at its core, cli­mate change is fun­da­ment­ally a human issue. It is about how soci­et­ies reor­gan­ise eco­nomic and social life within the lim­its imposed by our nat­ural envir­on­ment. One key dimen­sion of this human chal­lenge is own­er­ship.

There is a per­sist­ent assump­tion in pub­lic debates that private invest­ment must dom­in­ate renew­able energy. In South Africa, the fail­ures of many state-owned enter­prises have rein­forced this nar­rat­ive. Yet inter­na­tional exper­i­ence sug­gests something rather dif­fer­ent: in many suc­cess­ful eco­nom­ies, pub­lic, cooper­at­ive and com­munity own­er­ship is not the excep­tion, but an import­ant fea­ture of key sec­tors, includ­ing energy.

Take Switzer­land. Its eco­nomy is often por­trayed as a model of mar­ket cap­it­al­ism, yet some of its most import­ant firms are not privately owned in the con­ven­tional sense. The coun­try’s two largest retail­ers, Mig­ros and Coop, are both cooper­at­ives owned by their mem­bers.

They are among the largest firms in Switzer­land, with tens of bil­lions of Swiss francs in annual turnover and tens of thou­sands of employ­ees. Their sig­ni­fic­ance lies not only in their scale, but in their gov­ernance struc­tures, which embed social object­ives within eco­nomic activ­ity.

Import­antly, this model extends into energy. Switzer­land has a long tra­di­tion of cooper­at­ive util­it­ies and hun­dreds of energy cooper­at­ives involved in elec­tri­city gen­er­a­tion and dis­tri­bu­tion.

Den­mark, widely regarded as a global leader in renew­able energy, provides an espe­cially import­ant example. The Dan­ish trans­ition was not built solely on large private firms. Instead, it was driven by delib­er­ate policies that encour­aged com­munity and cooper­at­ive own­er­ship of wind energy.

By the early 2000s, more than 100,000 Dan­ish house­holds were mem­bers of wind cooper­at­ives that owned a sub­stan­tial share of the coun­try’s wind tur­bines.

The scale of par­ti­cip­a­tion mattered polit­ic­ally and socially. The well-known Mid­del­grunden off­shore wind farm, near Copen­ha­gen, was developed through a part­ner­ship between muni­cipal author­it­ies and a local cooper­at­ive, with thou­sands of cit­izens dir­ectly invest­ing in the project.

This broad own­er­ship base has gone hand in hand with extraordin­ary energy out­comes. Den­mark is now among the world lead­ers in renew­able elec­tri­city gen­er­a­tion, with wind power play­ing a cent­ral role in its elec­tri­city sys­tem.

Den­mark’s suc­cess reflects delib­er­ate policy choices. Guar­an­teed grid access, feedin tar­iffs and tax incent­ives were designed not only to accel­er­ate renew­able energy deploy­ment, but also to broaden own­er­ship and pub­lic par­ti­cip­a­tion.

The les­son is clear. Pub­lic and col­lect­ive own­er­ship is not neces­sar­ily a con­straint on effi­ciency. In many con­texts, it has strengthened both the pace of renew­able energy deploy­ment and pub­lic sup­port for the trans­ition. These invest­ments are also highly effi­cient.

For South Africa, the implic­a­tions are pro­found. We enter the energy trans­ition as one of the most unequal soci­et­ies in the world. If own­er­ship of renew­able energy assets is con­cen­trated among a nar­row group of private investors, the trans­ition risks deep­en­ing inequal­ity. The emer­ging green eco­nomy could become another enclave: cap­ital-intens­ive, exclus­ive and socially con­tested. And, import­antly, it will lack legit­im­acy.

This is not an argu­ment against private invest­ment. Private cap­ital will remain essen­tial to fin­an­cing the trans­ition.

Rather, it is an argu­ment for plural own­er­ship struc­tures. The inter­na­tional evid­ence sug­gests that the most suc­cess­ful trans­itions com­bine private invest­ment with strong forms of pub­lic, muni­cipal and cooper­at­ive own­er­ship.

South Africa can­not afford a trans­ition that is eco­nom­ic­ally effi­cient but socially brittle. A just trans­ition must be seen to be just, and it must deliver vis­ible bene­fits to a broad spec­trum of soci­ety.

We must build a renew­able energy sys­tem that is not only clean, but shared. Who owns the assets of the future will help determ­ine whether South Africa achieves a genu­inely just trans­ition, or merely a trans­ition that repro­duces and deep­ens exist­ing inequal­it­ies.

Share